Windows workflow vs bpel




















Better that vendors start focusing on the "m" in business process management, Todd points out. Only process execution metrics should be visible, he says. I've changed the way I charge my iPhone. You should, too. Time for a Linux smartphone? Developers are in short supply. Here are the skills and programming languages employers need. Best iPhones : Which model is right for you? Windows Do these six things right away after you finish setup. So, is XAML as big in MS world in general as it was planned to be a couple of years ago or has reality proved to be different?

I think it's fair to say that WF hasn't really become a mainstream technology for. This is a shame, really. But who knows? I think there's still a reasonable chance that it will get more mainstream over time. I am sure you understand where I am coming from. Thanks again, Semyon posted by semyon axelrod : June 02, AM.

I'm afraid that I've never seen any numbers like this. I would suspect, though, that a lot depends on the developers and on your future plans. And it is not a duplicate of the other questions. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes.

Consider the following code from the stateless site: Stateless has been designed with encapsulation within an ORM-ed domain model in mind. David Robbins David Robbins 9, 7 7 gold badges 49 49 silver badges 81 81 bronze badges. I am amazed how tight the code and how much it does. It really stands in stark contrast to Workflow Foundation.

I am actually using Stateless right now because of its simplicity - although I didn't mark it as the answer another question provided a good list of alternatives , I would encourage everyone to also mark this up to give David some more rep Thanks. Kinlan - I am curious about your prototype with Stateless. What shortcomings did it have? David - if you want control which I do and speed then Stateless seems like an ideal solution - there is not much too it, it does almost everything from a theory point of view that you learn about state machines, as long as you are comfortable with writing your own persistence and creation logic it seems like a very strong solution.

I suppose they might be it short comings for some people I haven't found anything else yet really to say "man I wish it did xyz", and I can at least code it to do it if I really need a feature. David, the one thing I did find was that the OnEnter event didn't fire for the start state, but I can't tell if that is correct or wrong : — Kinlan. Todd Stout Todd Stout 3, 3 3 gold badges 22 22 silver badges 29 29 bronze badges. Todd - I echo your view regarding WWF.

Getting data in and out of the workflow is hugely complex, requiring multiple projects to support interfaces and data exchange. I gave it up for using simple state machine where I am in complete control.

Jeremy Wiebe Jeremy Wiebe 3, 21 21 silver badges 31 31 bronze badges. I was also looking into Rhino Queueues not for the statemachine - but for queuing data in and out of the machine can't see to get it working though. Tangurena Tangurena 2, 1 1 gold badge 20 20 silver badges 39 39 bronze badges. Workflow models are also easy to change later because a long running process can be viewed as one workflow and easily found by future developers.

Compared to procedural code which must split up separate pieces of long running work. Require visibility into business logic — Once you decide to build with the patterns for WF you can take advantage of services provided for the pattern.

We also get visibility into individual business processes which are graphically represented and images can be pasted into documents and shown to business people. Require a scalable multithreaded host — Once a workflow model has been created it can be executed a large number of times and the workflow runtime will allocated CPU threads to these as required. WF is a great way to have multiple simultaneous threads running and communicating at once. Other things to consider:.

I am not familiar with the Java one but someone else may be able to comment on the comparison. Thanks Kavita, I really appreciate your help. You raised very intersting points that I will investigate further. The content you requested has been removed.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000